No Child Left Behind Act :: essays research papers

ProposalThe No Child Left rump trifle, a federal social program that tries to kick upstairss after school programs should be eliminated and the extra funds given to schools to decide where it goes.The NCLB Act, was designed to improve information and achievement in Americas schools in four all the way defined ways accountability for results, an emphasis on doing what works base on scientific research, expanded parental options and expanded local restrict flexibility. Basically the Federal political sympathies funds schools for after-school programs to try to encourage school participation among students and reduce dropping out of school. Examples of after-school programs funded by the NCLB act are first and foremost tutoring, then extra-curricular activities such as sports, community service etc.Problems/needThe NCLB Act is not legal because of the current situation of state governments calling certain schools failures because of their low scrutiny scores, thereby reducing financial support to the school. If the federal government is funding the NCLB Act for after school programs, it would seem that it was funding a non-effective program. I befool broken down the consequences as follows.-Low test scores, school gets reduced funding and put under state review.-Teachers fired, less motive for students to stay in school. Schools curriculum is ineffective.-Meaning more money would suck up to be spent on the NCLB Act for it to compensate the loss of the schools own after-school programs.-So failing a school, based on government standards, just to spend more on it? Digging their own dugout hole.Policy Proposals Based on my understanding of the education that I have received and the changes that I have witnessed, there are many alternatives to the NCLB Act, most of which I shall explain below.-Focus on strengthening the curriculum. Subjects should help student in the future. Introduction of GE courses in high school, instead of introducing GE courses in college.