Anthony Burgess’s A Clockwork Orange

The essential impinge in Anthony burgesss A Clockwork Orange exists between the singular and the kind order. Philip E. Ray, cites earlyish critics of A Clockwork Orange such as A.A. DeVitis, Carol M. Dix, and Robert K. Morris who suggest that the matter of the novel is the conflict between the natural and untainted Individual and the slushy and corrupt State (479).More importantly, A Clockwork Orange seems to address the item-by-items ability to stockpile his or her quit bequeath within the context of the collective nine, and, particularly, poses the interest question of whether the individuals primary side of submit will is through acts of force out. finished the depiction of a dystopian future, the novel interrogates the interrelationships and conflicts among the individual, society, violence, and empty will, thus requiring the referee to do the same.The novel opens with Alex, the storyteller and main character, sitting at a bar with his gang of droogs posing the question, Whats it going to be then, eh? (Burgess 1). Alex poses this question eleven times throughout the novel. In fact, the novel is book-ended by this question, as it is the firstborn line of the first chapter and the first line of the last.This question seems to present the referee with a declaration of free will. Essentially, Alex seems to be announcing his ability to choose any(prenominal) action he wishes. According to Veronica Hollinger, the question itself implies the power of the individual to behave choices (Hollinger 86). The power to choose is the power of free will, and for Alex, choice and free will must be press outed through violence. Even Burgess writes of a free and scarlet will (Burgess xii) in his introduction to A Clockwork Orange.The first act of violence perpetrated by Alex occurs within the first chapter when the narrator and his group of droogs attack a man in the streets. They proceed to beat out the man and destroy his property. The group of you ths revels in their impetuous outburst against the social machine, which is embodied for them in this adult. Within the first thirty pages, Alex and his gang argon responsible for four different instances of extreme violence, while the powers-that-be only make a brief appearance and are easily outwitted.The futuristic society of A Clockwork Orange is an extension of our society of commoditization. From clothing to drugs, e real feasible outlet for the structure of individual free will has been turned into a commodity of the society. The youth seems to be left without any possible expression of individual will. Alex seems to see violence as the last non-commercialized expression of individualistic free will available to him thus, it appears the individual must be in violent conflict with the social order in order to express free will.After the initial scenes of what Alex refers to as ultra-violence, the novel proceeds towards a serial publication of collisions between the two mai n players of the novel Alex and his society. The social order, embodied in several select social institutions, uses a variety of methods to control Alexs violence in order to maintain its own stability.Alex is eventually captured after he invades the home of a young woman and beats her to death, and the social order, in the form of governmentally funded scientists, begins the process of reforming Alex. The scientists remove Alex from prison and attempt to get over his ability to act violently through a chemically induce Pavlovian conditioning designed to make him sick at the very thought of violence. After the experiment is concluded, Alex is completely reformed and cannot stand to ordain violence or be witness to violence.When Alex loses his ability to choose violence, he also seems to lose any expression of will. The relationship between free will and violence is expressed through the musings of the prison chaplain who eventually poses the question, Is a man who chooses the bad perhaps in some way violate than a man who has the good imposed on him? (Burgess 106).Essentially, the chaplain worries that Alex cannot be actually human and good if he cannot make a choice to be, or not be, violent. After Alex is conditioned and his violent free will is removed, he undergoes a series of hardships, ending in his near suicide.From the moment Alex loses his violent will, the reader must watch him undergo torments in the form of rejection by his parents, beatings by his previous friends, and torture at the hands of a fundament anti-government writer. Further, Alex is pushed around from place to place and seems to have no will of his own. The bolshy of a violent will seems to be the loss of free will and individuality.Violence in A Clockwork Orange appears to function as synecdoche for all individual expression. If the only way for Alex to express himself effectively is to engage in violent acts, then the violence-less Alex is a tragic creature because he lacks any expression at all. The destruction of violence by society is the destruction of the individual and expressions of free will.Despite the evidence that violence is only an expression of the individual and free will, the text is also full of examples that point towards violence as a mechanism of society. In fact, the society seems to need violence just as much as Alex, as a representation of the individual, does. Violence is exhibited as a tool of the social order in several find out scenesnotably a police brutality scene after Alex is released from prison and the novels original, final chapter.